Last week the republican debate on CNBC has provoked a rebellion against the moderators. Although I agree that the format is not favorable for a more ample discussion, how one can fix that when you have 10 people trying to convey their messages and you have limited amount of time? It is inevitable that those who are bolder will go over their time, they will talk over the others; in certain moments there were so much talking that was impossible to know who was screaming more. The rebellion against the moderators is unjustified however. Republicans are customary liars and they distort the facts: they got very upset because they were being questioned about their lies or as Kasich pointed out, their fantasies.